Battle for America

Headlines would leave the reader believing that there are several wars against modernity. The war on women, the war on religion, the war on drugs, the war on any other war some political marketer wants to sell. Literal war in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan (via flying death robots), standing American armies all across the globe. The enormous gulf that has emerged between the most wealthy and the most poor. The value of accreditation over intelligence. The disintegration of understanding and compassion, or even recognition of human dignity outside one’s own tribe.

There is really one war, and it is this: the inner battle of white American men, as they strive to redefine themselves and understand their loss of privilege.

I am not sympathizing with a racist man who shoots up a place of worship. I want to understand him, and understand his worldview, so I can help diffuse this tension and create a more peaceful world.

What is the experience of being a white male American today, and how does this compare with his belief of what that experience was like in the past? What does he believe that he has lost?

I don’t ask what does it mean to be an white male American. Meaning is a value judgement.

To understand him, I have to step into his world and leave my own behind. I have to willingly suspend my belief in the morals that I personally hold. I have to put myself in the center of his world, both real and perceived. I have to become that man, to see how the world looks through his eyes, and then I might be able to understand why he thinks the way he thinks and does the things he does.

If I am a white American male who grew up in a culture where I have certain privileges; where wives and mothers perform household maintenance, defer to my leadership, where I can be fairly confident that the market for my job skills is limited so my chances of employment is good, why would I NOT be offended, outraged, threatened, by the loss of this lifestyle?

Wifes and mothers no longer performing these tasks, twenty people applying for a job where there used to be five, and some of them might not even speak the language. Wages stagnating because less skilled workers will take lower pay, and then corporate bosses moving jobs overseas where the labor is cheaper still. How’s a guy supposed to get by?

This man isn’t just a poor southern blue collar worker. The corporate raiders and Wall Street traders and software engineers and surgeons and senators who have worked their way to their positions of privilege are just as vulnerable as the auto mechanic. What’s more, they might feel they have more to lose than their lower class bretheren, and while their warfare will be cleaner, it will be just as brutal.

Media adds a feedback loop of resentment. The man on the radio tells you that you lost out on the American Dream because some other guy (usually a brown guy) took “your” job. Calibrated language, designed to raise anger and suspicion, jacks up your tension further. The man calls women dames and broads and chicks, and then taunts you with them. These dames and broads and chicks are taking your job, and they’re not doing their own, and they’re flaunting their sexuality at you, but they want you to pay for their birth control (which they use with somebody else)… what’s a guy to do? He gets mad, and who can blame him?


This is the subconscious background tape of the angry white American male is listening to. If you want to stop the violence, reduce the wealth gap, and restore basic fairness, you’ve got to stop that background tape.

You’ve also got to recognize that he HAS lost the privilege he thought he was going to live with. There is no guarantee that someone will be there to perform the around-life tasks. Grocery shopping and cooking and laundry and childcare. He has to do these things himself now, AND compete with his wife in the job market. His feelings of loss and grief have to be validated, NOT because you agree that he SHOULD have privilege in the first place, but because, in order to get him to work toward a more equal future, you’ve got to demonstrate that you respect him and his past. He can’t think and reason and negotiate if he feels threatened, and right now, he feels his life is on the line.

When this threatened man is finally validated, when he knows that we know that he lost out on the good life he expected, and when he has grieved that loss, then he can start to imagine what a future might look like, and how it might be ok after all.


Now I have to decide if I have the courage to speak these unspeakable truths. Because the mantra of the left is that The Man is always wrong, and there is nothing good in him, and you should NEVER validate an angry, violent person, no matter what their reason for being angry or violent might be.

And do I have the courage to speak these unspeakable truths at the same time I’m hawking myself out as a writer, willing to sell your product lies to anyone I can get to buy them?

Posted in Culture Wars, Philosophy, Pure Politics | Leave a comment

Self employment sucks

And the thing about it is, I get stuck inside my own head, and with nobody else here to entertain me, I get, um, lost.

What I really need is an actual problem, outside my head, that I can solve. I like solving problems. The only things here that keep me occupied are yarn, dishes, and cats. There’s only so much you can do with yarn, dishes, and cats.

I’m so stuck inside my own head I don’t even know how to describe it. I decided today that the human brain is the pink padded cell of the soul; the place where the otherwise-incapacitated go for something approaching rehabilitation.

if this is rehabilitation, I’m not sure insanity wouldn’t be better.

I have nothing to do and noone to do it with. What could go wrong?

Posted in Philosophy | Leave a comment

Deadbeat corporations don’t WANT to pay their bills

This economy is a mess.  Everything I read prompts more questions, rather than answering them.

Here’s today’s puzzlement.

John McCain thinks letting corporations bring the estimated $1.2-1.5 trillion they’ve stashed in overseas tax havens back to the US at a significantly reduced rate, so they can buy “more yachts and corporate jets and all that” is a good idea. Because it will stimulate the economy, just like that 2004 tax holiday did. Remember that?

Just how many jets and yachts would need to be purchased to equal the daily spending power of the middle class just getting by?

And how do I find that number out?

Corporations spent the 2004 tax holiday money buying back, and thus bolstering, their own stock, as well as issuing huge executive bonuses. What would have happened if those taxes had actually been paid? What programs could have been funded?

More. What if corporations had spent that tax-free money doing what they promised: building factories, creating jobs, educating workers, buying health insurance? What economic impact would that have had? Would we be in this recession now?

Corporations do not want to pay the full 35 percent tax, so they are portraying their offshore earnings as “trapped” abroad (emphasis mine) and asking for a tax break to repatriate them. (citation)

Let me get this straight. Corporations like oil companies and financial services and technology, with the highest profits in history, are hiding their money offshore because they don’t want to pay taxes. They have a bill and they just don’t want to pay it. Not can’t, but don’t want to.

They are asking for their bill to be cut, just because. Isn’t this exactly what they refuse to give mortgage holders facing forclosure?

Posted in Financial Crisis | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

A meditation on right-wing cognitive dissonance

Conservatives fetishize what they consider traditional life. Family farms, mom and pop businesses. Good neighbors helping one another clean up after a storm.

Republican politics, on the other hand, treat labor as a moral failing. If you take your shower after work, rather than before, you must have done something bad to deserve such a dirty job. At best, you must be a lazy scoundrel, or else you could have a nice, clean pencil pushing job like us.

Here’s the thing. If you earn a paycheck that is signed by someone else, you are a member of the LABOR FORCE. You trade your LABOR in exchange for money. It doesn’t matter how big that paycheck is, you’re still a laborer.

Before the Industrial Revolution, even the professions – doctor, lawyer, accountant, engineer- were lower class work. For the son of a gentleman to lower himself to take a mere profession was scandalous. Being poor but not working for someone else had a higher social status than wealthy and taking a paycheck.

These so-called conservatives make absolutely no sense. They don’t even understand the history of their own biases.

Posted in Culture Wars, Philosophy, Pure Politics | Leave a comment

BofA is trying to stiff you with $74 TRILLION

Look. This is EXACTLY what financial regulation is designed to prevent.

Bank of America Corp is trying to take $74 trillion dollars in bad investments under its faltering Merrill Lynch subsidiary, which is not federally insured, and MOVE that loss to the very successful and stable retail Bank of America unit, which is.

Here’s the killer. The Fed, which regulates Merrill, thinks it’s a good idea because it would protect Merrill by spreading that loss out. The FDIC says it’s a bad move, because if the bank were to fail, FDIC would be on the hook to reimburse all of those retail banking accounts that would be pulled under.

We created laws that separated retail banks, investment banks, and insurance companies in the 1930′s, to prevent this very thing from happening. Those laws, grouped under the Glass Steagall heading, were repealed in the 1999 under Gramm Leach Blily. The Republican lead Congress knowingly and intentionally undid the security precautions to prevent another gigantic banking and financial failure like the one that caused the Great Depression. A decade after those precautions are removed and BofA is doing THE SAME SHIT that caused failure in the first place.

If that isn’t cause to split up the banks and reinstall Glass Steagall, I don’t know what is.

The most worrisome part is that what they are attempting may technically be legal. Dodd Frank was supposed to prevent more shenanigans, but there’s sections that say, if a single organization owns the whole financial chain, they can move it around within the organization as much as they like. I discussed this last June.

If you’re not angry, you’re not paying attention.

Posted in Financial Crisis | Leave a comment

They should be the ones to pay for it

Unbelievable. Fisker Automotive, one of the new companies designing and building electric cars, took $529 million in US loan money and is now manufacturing in Finland.

ABC News quotes company founder Henrik Fisker, “There was no contract manufacturer in the U.S. that could actually produce our vehicle,” the car company’s founder and namesake told ABC News. “They don’t exist here.”

Pardon me just a moment.

The whole point, the challenge, of starting a new company is that you start from nothing and you make something. The fact that there is not currently a contract manufacturer who can build your brand new technology is not the problem. Your lack of imagination to create an in-house manufacturing facility that can build it, is.

I have been part of start ups. I have seen a small team hire hundreds of people to do a job, create the training material, train the trainers, and then train the staff to do the work they’ve been hired to do. It is not rocket science.

U.S. manufacturing is stagnant because people like Fisker make the decision to maximize their short term profit by outsourcing work the cheapest producer, instead of making a long term commitment to producing that work in-house. It is short sighted at best, and catastrophic at worst. An in-house team can be modified, retrained, retrofitted, fine tuned to meet changing needs much easier than an outsource team can. What’s more, the team will have a much higher sense of loyalty to the company whose name is on their paycheck than to the company who pays the contract. The quality of work inevitably suffers when a contractor, who cares more about the contract than the product, is in charge.

The U.S. must regain a manufacturing base, and it’s going to cost money. Factories that were shuttered have to be reopened, retooled, people need to be retrained, and that will cost big. I believe the people who benefited the most from demolishing our factories should be the ones who pay for their restoration.

We make plans and sacrifice our time and treasury to build up other nations. We spent so much rebuilding Europe after WWII.

We need a Marshall Plan to rebuild the United States following the war that greedy businesses have waged on us for decades. And they should be the ones to pay for it.

Posted in Financial Crisis, Jobs | Leave a comment

On the trap of the narrative arc

Last night Senate Republicans effectively shut out President Obama’s bill to fund public employees – teachers, emergency personnel, etc. It is clear that Republicans are willing to do anything to scuttle this administration, even if it destroys the nation in the process. Republicans, with assist of powerful corporate voices, are obstructing any govt progress, demanding 60% supermajority for ordinary votes, filibustering, rejecting appointments, holding budgets hostage.

These powerful interests are enabled by a confused or misguided media who have replaced genuine objectivity for mere bilateralism. To be truly objective, a journalist must find and relate the truth of a matter, not just relate a narrative that will get eyeballs. Journalism is NOT just any other kind of writing. It should be more akin to technical writing than fiction; relating the FACTS first, tell the STORY only as it reflects the reality shown by the facts.

A journalist whose primary motive is to find a story will always find one, but it may not be the story that actually informs the public. Because we all have unconscious stories and motives running like a background soundtrack in our head, the story this journalist may be telling is probably her own. If instead she gathers facts about the events or ideas and builds a framework to relate those facts, whether or not they have a narrative arc, she will be a more accurate reporter.

Scanning headlines would lead one to believe that Congres is in deadlock, and that no one in either house is willing to do anything. The facts suggest otherwise: that a small but extremely wealthy – and therefore powerful – groups of people have bought lawmakers through a combination of campaign contributions and prewritten legislation that overworked staff can plug-and-play into law, and that these laws support and strengthen the interests of the groups that provided them.

The reader need look no further than the billionaire Koch Brothers and their foundations for an example.

An even more insidious one is Rupert Murdoch, whose News Corp uses his money to buy influence and his media empire to wield it.

We are not sliding, we have sliden, into a process where corporate interests and gvernment have aligned, to the benefit of those who hold that corporate power. Some parts of the public (Tea Party members manipulated by manufactured nostalgia) have fallen for a narrative that this is acceptable, because they too can some day maybe if they’re really lucky, be a part of that power infrastructure. The American Dream morphed into a moving sidewalk, and if you’re one of the lucky few, you can hop on and fast track past all the rest of the schlubs.

Another part has found itself gathered together to express a shared grief: loss of jobs, loss of identity, loss of hard earned savings, loss of dignity, loss of hope.

It strikes me just now, as I’m typing, that a journalist looking for narrative could take a turn as sociologist and start gathering case studies. Just start talking to people, one at a time, and share their stories. A journalist as fact teller could look back from the narratives, look at the statistics, look at the job numbers and meltdown facts, and find the events and their instigators, and report the history and timelines.

It feels like the power establishment is looking to the populace to actually fix the problems. Thing is, we don’t know how. We listen to the stories you tell us and then pick one of you on election day. If we knew how to make it All Better, we would. That’s what we hired you for.

Posted in Philosophy, Pure Politics | Leave a comment

Herman Cain’s latest flip-flop

Cain’s seemingly bipolar response to “the abortion issue” is very easy to understand. As a genuine Conservative, he feels that government intervention in private decisions is wrong. As a Republican nominee for office he understands the need to appear to follow the mainstream conservative Christian influenced Republican ideal of family life: that “nice” women don’t get pregnant if they don’t want to, and that if they do, the woman should be forced to put the fetus’ needs ahead of her own.

It’s not Cain who is bipolar. It’s the Republican platform.

Posted in Pure Politics | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Populism being targeted by anti-Semitism. It’s not OK.

Our two populist movements have, this morning, taken dramatically different directions.  While GOP operatives decry #OWS as anti-Semitic, actual White Supremacists and Anti-Semites are planning to recruite Tea Party members into their hateful and counterproductive ideology.

#OWS, on the other hand, has issued a declaration, modeled on the processes and documentation that founded our nation, which calls for a popular petition to the government for redress of grievances. These include banning private funding of elections, closing the “revolving door” that permits  public officials from working for or gaining from persons, corporations or entities that they are supposed to be regulating, debt reduction, and the creation of actual universal health coverage.

Both sides have picked July 4th as their date of execution.

Rank-and-file Tea Party members and corporate (and government) sponsors would be well advised to back away from, repudiate, and otherwise block radical right wing elements from coopting their message.

#OWS would be well advised to embrace any elements who genuinely want to reform government, even those from the right side of the political spectrum.  Those whose political ideals fall on the right, who also reject racist, biggoted messages and movements, need a place to stand. The nonpartisan #OWS promise can be made real, very quickly, by actively reaching out and opening the door to people who would naturally feel hesitant to join them.

It’s also important to make these actions very public. The RNC MUST repudiate not just the racists and bigots who want to corrupt their message, but to also stop smearing #OWS with the anti-Semite label, when their own movement is the active target of those who wear it proudly.

The desire for clean, uncorrupt government is neither left wing nor right wing. It is a moral right and a moral imperative. People from all walks and all philosophies CAN and MUST work together to make it happen.

Posted in Culture Wars, Pure Politics | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Leave it in Vegas

The people who love me have asked me to stop watching things like the GOP debates. I throw things, and apparently it can get ugly. Who knew?

They didn’t tell me I can’t watch the clips afterwards, or listen to the livetweet commentary.  Sometimes I even participate, when direction observation of the inanity is not required.  Like fruit.

You had to be there.

A few observations after the fact.

1. There is only one candidate who has the actual ability to get through a debate. Every single one of them appears to have sidestepped, ignored, misunderstood, or just plain fumbled their questions, and badly. Only Romney acted like a grown up in the room, with the rest falling into childish bickering and word salad. I disagree with much of what the GOP stands for, but I expect their candidates to be able to hold a conversation.

2. Rick Perry needs to stop calling people Brother unless he’s actually related to them.  Sorry, gov, but that just looked and sounded racist. You only called the black guy brother.

3. Michele Bachmann needs a stylist. The Neru jacket in a western political venue looks less idealistic and more science fiction bad guy. I don’t think that’s the look you were going for. Combine with the excess makeup and severe hair? Not a look I want to see on my tv machine for four years. Is it fair? No. Get over it.

4. Herman Cain needs to hire some experts. 999 is not a plan, it’s a series of digits. If you can’t explain it, you can’t implement it.  If you have to say, read the material, it’s not working. If you have to compare economies to fruit, you’re losing. It was stupid. It made no sense whatsoever. Bad analogy, bad communication. Hire someone. As a former executive, you should know that someone in your position needs expert advice from people who specialize in their field. Find them. Pay them. You have the money.

5. Rick Santorum just looks sad and like he needs a nap. Time to call it in.

6. Ron Paul. Ron Paul… what can you say? He could be a reasonable candidate if he didn’t have a few nonsensical ideas, like unwavering faith in the perfection of a so-called pure free market, and his disapproval of mandatory vaccinations for children, (herd immunity, doctor?) or his absolute rejection of abortion even to save a woman’s life.

I predict Romney will win the nomination when the rest of the group trips over their collective tongues enough times to show that they lack the necessary skills to be president. Like speaking complete sentences, or knowing that Libya is in Africa, or that the IAEA which is part of the UN, might be a good thing.

Posted in Pure Politics | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment